Goldman Sachs Warns Global Conflict Risk Is at Its Highest Since the 1960s

Goldman Sachs says the risk of a major global conflict has reached its highest level since the 1960s as geopolitical fragmentation continues to intensify.

By Michael Foster Published:

The risk of a major global conflict has climbed to its highest level since the mid-1960s, according to Goldman Sachs analysts, who warn that the world is entering its most geopolitically dangerous period in decades. The bank argues that growing fragmentation between major powers and the formation of increasingly polarized geopolitical blocs are creating a sustained environment of elevated global risk.

Rather than viewing current tensions as a temporary spike, Goldman believes the world is experiencing a structural shift toward greater geopolitical competition. According to the firm’s assessment, the current environment is defined by multiple overlapping fault lines – including military conflicts, economic rivalry, trade restrictions, technology competition, and shifting international alliances that are likely to persist through at least the end of the decade.

The warning comes as governments increasingly prioritize national security and strategic industries over globalization. Export controls on advanced semiconductors, restrictions on critical technologies, reshoring of manufacturing, and rising defense spending have all become defining features of the current economic landscape. Global institutions have likewise identified geoeconomic confrontation and interstate conflict as the two most significant near-term risks facing the world economy.

For financial markets, sustained geopolitical uncertainty has broad implications. Heightened tensions can disrupt global supply chains, increase commodity price volatility, alter investment flows, and accelerate government spending on defense, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and domestic manufacturing. Investors have already witnessed repeated market swings tied to conflicts in the Middle East, U.S.-China technology competition, and concerns over Taiwan, while companies continue adjusting supply chains to reduce geopolitical exposure.

Goldman suggests the current environment differs from previous isolated crises because multiple geopolitical flashpoints are unfolding simultaneously. Instead of a single event driving uncertainty, investors and policymakers are confronting an increasingly fragmented international order in which economic policy, technology, finance, and national security have become deeply interconnected.

While geopolitical forecasts remain inherently uncertain, the bank expects elevated tensions to remain a defining feature of the global economy for years to come. For businesses and investors, that implies a greater need to prepare for supply-chain disruptions, market volatility, and a world where geopolitical developments play a larger role in investment decisions than they have for much of the past three decades.

Economy, Geopolitics & Policy