Stocks

Tesla and SpaceX Fall Over 4% on Data Center Policy Fears

Tesla and SpaceX drop over 4% before the open after Democratic election wins raise data center concerns, while several major technology stocks rebound.

By Daniel Wright Edited by Michael Foster Published:
Tesla and SpaceX Fall Over 4% on Data Center Policy Fears
Elon Musk, right, speaks with then-NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine at SpaceX headquarters in October 2019. Tesla and SpaceX shares now face renewed scrutiny over Texas data center policy after the midterm elections. Photo: Aubrey Gemignani / NASA

Key Notes

  • SpaceX fell 4.6% and Tesla declined 4.4% in the latest verified premarket coverage after Democratic election victories.
  • Texas data center proposals drew attention, but their final scope and effect on individual projects remain unresolved.
  • The wider technology response was mixed, with Microsoft and Nasdaq-100 futures recovering even as some infrastructure stocks remained lower.

Tesla Inc. (Nasdaq: TSLA) and SpaceX (Nasdaq: SPCX) fell more than 4% in premarket trading on Wednesday as Democratic election victories heightened concerns about the pace of AI data center development, particularly in Texas, where both companies are based.

SpaceX was down 4.6% and Tesla fell 4.4% in CNBC’s coverage, updated at 11:35 UTC. The quotes reflect extended-hours trading before the US opening bell. The weakness in Musk’s companies persisted even as parts of the wider technology sector recovered.

Texas Becomes a Focus for AI Investors

Democrat Gina Hinojosa’s projected victory over Governor Greg Abbott has brought her proposed restrictions on data centers into the market’s assessment of future AI capacity. Texas represents 27% of planned US data center gigawatts, according to Wells Fargo estimates cited in the same coverage.

The policy debate predates the election. In a July proposal, Hinojosa called for a moratorium on new data centers until state lawmakers adopted protections. Her campaign identified water supplies, electricity costs, community participation and public subsidies among the issues it wanted addressed.

That is a state-level policy position. The election result does not by itself impose a nationwide construction ban, determine which projects would be covered or settle whether existing approvals would be affected. Investors still need the text of any rules, their legal basis and an implementation timetable to assess individual developments.

The debate is also broader than a party-line dispute. FOX 7’s account documented Abbott’s own calls for restrictions on rural projects and for operators to bear their power and water costs. The question facing developers is therefore how the rules evolve, as well as which party holds office.

The Technology Trade Shows a Mixed Response

The latest snapshot showed a divergence across AI-linked stocks. CoreWeave Inc. (Nasdaq: CRWV) was down 0.8%, while Oracle Corp. (NYSE: ORCL) fell 1.3%. Both remained under pressure, but their declines differed substantially from those in Tesla and SpaceX.

Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT), meanwhile, was among the technology giants trading roughly 1%–2% higher. Nasdaq-100 futures were up about 1% in the same coverage, showing that the election response varied across companies and changed as trading progressed.

As we reported earlier, index futures had recovered from sharper overnight losses. A rebound in the broader market can coexist with sustained selling in businesses facing more specific political or infrastructure risks.

Construction Delays Can Change Project Economics

For companies building computing infrastructure, the timing of approvals matters alongside demand for AI services. Equipment, land, construction and financing can require spending well before a facility generates revenue. A delay can push expected cash receipts further out while some costs continue.

The consequences depend on individual contracts and projects. An early-stage proposal awaiting permits has a different exposure from an operating facility or a construction site with existing approvals. A moratorium’s duration, exemptions and treatment of pending applications would determine how much activity is actually affected.

That distinction is especially relevant to companies combining large capital programs with external financing. SpaceX’s AI funding requirements have already drawn investor attention, as we previously reported.

TSLA and SPCX Investors Face Separate Corporate Questions

Political developments arrive alongside the companies’ review of a potential combination. As we reported, Tesla and SpaceX have been examining possible merger structures through independent committees. Those discussions remain distinct from an agreed transaction.

The next substantive tests for the data center story are concrete policy proposals and company disclosures about affected projects. Until those details emerge, the market is pricing a risk to future development, while the scope and financial consequences remain uncertain.

Big Tech & Innovation, Geopolitics & Policy, Markets, News, Stocks